2000
DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2000.9525319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the applicability of a computer model for business performance analysis in SMEs: A case study from Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Others utilized objective measures in terms of turnover, profitability, and export sales (Ernst & Young, 1996 and 1997, as cited in Bryson et al , 1999, pp. 95‐105), productivity, maintenance efficiency, on‐time delivery, lead time, capacity utilization, and quality (Lind et al , 2000; Hvolby and Thorstenson, 2001). While conventional wisdom would credit objective measures with higher objectivity and accuracy, more researchers have so far relied on the use of subjective performance measures.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others utilized objective measures in terms of turnover, profitability, and export sales (Ernst & Young, 1996 and 1997, as cited in Bryson et al , 1999, pp. 95‐105), productivity, maintenance efficiency, on‐time delivery, lead time, capacity utilization, and quality (Lind et al , 2000; Hvolby and Thorstenson, 2001). While conventional wisdom would credit objective measures with higher objectivity and accuracy, more researchers have so far relied on the use of subjective performance measures.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors have sought remedies in the diffusion of methodical professional practice, adapted to accommodate the requirements of the organization and its participants (Kiely and Fitzgerald, 2005), and in adopting effective management practices (Lind, 2000;Lind et al, 2000). Yet, others have been sceptical about the effectiveness of professional IS practice, codified and institutionalized in systems developments methods, to address the particular conditions of organizations in developing countries.…”
Section: Problematization Of Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several scholars take trusted on particular presentation criteria for a company such as creation achievement, sales and marketplace part development, and productivity associated to their projections (Maury, 2006). Other researchers use impartial presentation criteria in relations of revenue, efficiency, distribute sales, productivity, maintenance efficiency, timely delivery, volume consumption, and value (Lind et al, 2000). The use of such objective performance standards is the simplest way to evaluate a company's presentation.…”
Section: Corporate Performancementioning
confidence: 99%