2016
DOI: 10.1017/rdc.2016.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Age and Growth Rate of Giant Cacti: Radiocarbon Dating of the Spines of Cardon (Pachycereus Pringlei)

Abstract: Age estimation has been a limiting factor in the study of giant columnar cacti. In order to test the feasibility of using radiocarbon methods to estimate the age of the giant cardon cacti (Pachycereus pringlei), we selected six sites spanning the latitudinal and precipitation range of the species in the Baja California peninsula. In each site, we selected four individuals of different heights and sampled a spine from the lowest areole in the stem. The age of the spine was estimated using 14C dating, and the me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative stem growth rates are generally higher in Sonoran Desert giant cacti species that produce many, relatively short-lived basal stems compared to co-occurring single-stemmed giant cacti species that do not produce secondary arms from its main stem until several decades after establishment (Parker, 1988;Delgado-Fernández et al, 2016). For example, age-height relationships measured on the multi-stemmed L. schottii and S. thurberi plants in the northern Sonoran Desert found that a stem 5 m long had a mean age of 37 and 35 yr, respectively (Parker, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Relative stem growth rates are generally higher in Sonoran Desert giant cacti species that produce many, relatively short-lived basal stems compared to co-occurring single-stemmed giant cacti species that do not produce secondary arms from its main stem until several decades after establishment (Parker, 1988;Delgado-Fernández et al, 2016). For example, age-height relationships measured on the multi-stemmed L. schottii and S. thurberi plants in the northern Sonoran Desert found that a stem 5 m long had a mean age of 37 and 35 yr, respectively (Parker, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, age-height relationships measured on the multi-stemmed L. schottii and S. thurberi plants in the northern Sonoran Desert found that a stem 5 m long had a mean age of 37 and 35 yr, respectively (Parker, 1988). In contrast, a C. gigantea plant 5 m tall in the northern Sonoran Desert would have an expected mean age of 65-110 years, depending on location and mean annual precipitation (Pierson et al, 2013), while a 5-m-tall plant of P. pringlei would be expected to have a mean age of 45-90 yr, depending on location and mean annual precipitation (Delgado-Fernández et al, 2016). Stem growth rates are an important fitness trait in giant cacti species because in most species, flowers and fruits are produced primarily from recently constructed areoles near the apex of the stem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the isotope curves of W. robusta exhibited some relationship with historical climate events, the utility of the data might improve if a methodology to estimate the age of formation of stem cellulose were to be developed. Approaches for calculating the ages of plants using 14 C in species without growth rings, such as Pachycereus pringlei (Delgado-Fernández et al, 2016), Carnegiea gigantea (English et al, 2007), and tropical trees such as Otoba gracilipes and the palm Oenocarpus bataua (del Valle et al, 2014), have been developed. Similarly, it will be important for future research to calculate the relationship of the whole hydrological cycle, including precipitation, humidity, temperature, and evaporation that is involved in the absorption of water by W. robusta palms, to obtain more reliable assessments of δ 18 O in this species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%