2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2011.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the accurate identification of active set for constrained minimax problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 28 ] described a technique based on the algebraic representation of the constraint set, which identifies active constraints in a neighborhood of a solution. The extension to constrained minimax problems was also first presented in [ 30 ] without strict complementarity and linear independence. Moreover, the identification technique of active constraints for constrained minimax problems can be more suitable for infeasible algorithms, such as the strongly sub-feasible direction method and the penalty function method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 28 ] described a technique based on the algebraic representation of the constraint set, which identifies active constraints in a neighborhood of a solution. The extension to constrained minimax problems was also first presented in [ 30 ] without strict complementarity and linear independence. Moreover, the identification technique of active constraints for constrained minimax problems can be more suitable for infeasible algorithms, such as the strongly sub-feasible direction method and the penalty function method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this paper is to propose such an algorithm, analyze its convergence properties, and report its numerical performance. Motivated by [ 26 , 30 ], in this paper, we propose a generalized gradient projection algorithm directly on with a new working set for the problem ( 1 ). The characteristics of our proposed algorithm can be summarized as follows: We propose a new optimal identification function for the stationary point, from which we provide a new working set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems with inequality constraints can be reformulated in the above form by introducing slack variables. Moreover, nonlinear constrained programming is significant for solving engineering optimization problems in other forms, for example, the minimax problems (Jian, Quan, and Zhang 2007;Wang and Zhang 2008;Han, Jian, and Li 2011;Jian et al 2014) and dynamic optimization problems (Hu, Ong, and Teo 2002;Mohammed and Zhang 2013;Liu, Li, and Liu 2015;Zhang et al 2015). The filter method, as an alternative to merit functions for nonlinear constrained programming, was first proposed by Fletcher and Leyffer (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a constrained differentiable optimization problem. By transforming (1) into the nonlinear programming problem (2) we can solve it by well-established methods such as feasible-directions algorithms [35], sequential quadratic programming type algorithms [9,13,14,24,45], active set methods [10], interior point methods [22,26,42] and conjugate gradient methods in conjunction with exact penalties and smoothing [48]. Another method is that Problem (1) is reduced to a standard unconstrained smooth optimization problem by using an exponential penalty function…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%