2007
DOI: 10.1109/tsmcb.2007.904831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Techniques for Angle Compensation in Nonideal Iris Recognition

Abstract: The popularity of the iris biometric has grown considerably over the past two to three years. Most research has been focused on the development of new iris processing and recognition algorithms for frontal view iris images. However, a few challenging directions in iris research have been identified, including processing of a nonideal iris and iris at a distance. In this paper, we describe two nonideal iris recognition systems and analyze their performance. The word "nonideal" is used in the sense of compensati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.1. (2003) Geodesic active contour Roy et al (2007) Variational level sets Daugman (2003) Fourier-based approximation Schuckers et al (2007) Active shape models Pundlik et al (2008) Graph cuts Zuo and Schmid (2010) Ellipse fitting He et al (2013) Pulling and pushing model Du et al (2014) Scale invariants feature transform Masek et al (2015; Circular Hough transform Lim et al, 2014;Huang et al, 1990;Yuan et al (2005) Edge detection and Hough transform Huang et al (1990) Phase congruency and Hough transform Based on available documented literatures, Jillela and Ross (2013) had reported there is various iris segmentation approaches have been proposed to deal with the non-ideal eye image such as off-angled, occlusion and blurry motion situation as summarizes in Table 2.2. However, it is very rare to find documented publications on pigment spots.…”
Section: ) **Na: Not Availablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.1. (2003) Geodesic active contour Roy et al (2007) Variational level sets Daugman (2003) Fourier-based approximation Schuckers et al (2007) Active shape models Pundlik et al (2008) Graph cuts Zuo and Schmid (2010) Ellipse fitting He et al (2013) Pulling and pushing model Du et al (2014) Scale invariants feature transform Masek et al (2015; Circular Hough transform Lim et al, 2014;Huang et al, 1990;Yuan et al (2005) Edge detection and Hough transform Huang et al (1990) Phase congruency and Hough transform Based on available documented literatures, Jillela and Ross (2013) had reported there is various iris segmentation approaches have been proposed to deal with the non-ideal eye image such as off-angled, occlusion and blurry motion situation as summarizes in Table 2.2. However, it is very rare to find documented publications on pigment spots.…”
Section: ) **Na: Not Availablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realtime gaze compensation technique introduced by Daugman [25] or other techniques in literature can be used for this purpose [28], [29]. Schuckers et al [29] noted considerable improvement on iris recognition performance when gaze angle was compensated for images which are up to 15 o off-axis. Also, current gaze estimation techniques can estimate gaze angle with an average 3.5 o error over a 50 o range [30].…”
Section: ) Usable Iris Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the image energy is defined in terms of the intensity difference on two sides of contour, shape energy tracks the difference between the current and average trained shape. Other approaches [6,15] have also identified the drawback of circular fitting, and use more complex shapes (like ellipses) or view-angle transformations to account for off-gaze.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%