1980
DOI: 10.1016/0097-3165(80)90058-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Sperner families in which no K sets have an empty intersection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An i m p r o v e m e n t of our procedure in proving Theorem 4 as the a u t h o r has done in [7] w o u l d improve our n o , but there a r e , for at least # = 3 and small n, functions whose minimal disjunctive normal forms have greater complexity (for certain measures) as t h a t according to Theorem 4. L e t us consider the following ~,XAMPL~: L e t # = 3, let n = 10 and let e = 1 in our measure.…”
Section: F7mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An i m p r o v e m e n t of our procedure in proving Theorem 4 as the a u t h o r has done in [7] w o u l d improve our n o , but there a r e , for at least # = 3 and small n, functions whose minimal disjunctive normal forms have greater complexity (for certain measures) as t h a t according to Theorem 4. L e t us consider the following ~,XAMPL~: L e t # = 3, let n = 10 and let e = 1 in our measure.…”
Section: F7mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Using (3) we have according to (6). Repeated applications of this operation yield eventually a Spernsr family ~ in which no # sets have the union R, consisting only of sets having at most a = [(n --1)]2] elements, and its complexity is not less than that of ~.…”
Section: Njmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For 3-wise 1-intersecting families, it was the subject of several papers of Frankl [3] and Gronau [10,11,12,13] and it is known that for n553 the only optimal families are [ f½n À 1g [ f½n À fn À 1gg;…”
Section: à ámentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case r = 2 was observed by Erdős-Ko-Rado [7], Frankl [9], Wilson [34], and then m(n, k, 2, t) = max i |F i (n, k, 2, t)| was finally proved by Ahlswede and Khachatrian [2]. Frankl [8] showed m(n, k, r, 1) = |F 0 (n, k, r, 1)| if (r − 1)n rk, see also [20,27]. Partial results for the cases r 3 and t 2 are found in [12,14,[29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%