Abstract:Motivated by the Frankl's results in [P. Frankl, Multiply-intersecting families, J. Combin. Theory B 53 (1991) 195-234], we consider some problems concerning the maximum size of multiply-intersecting families with additional conditions. Among other results, we show the following version of the Erdős-KoRado theorem: for all r 5 and 1 t 2 r+1 − 3r − 1 there exist positive constants ε and n 0 such that if n > n 0 and | k n − 1 2 | < ε then r-wise t-intersecting k-uniform families on n vertices have size at most … Show more
“…Much research has been done for the case of families in {0, 1} n , and there are many challenging open problems. The interested reader is referred to [2,3,4,8,9].…”
Abstract. Let A ⊂ N n be an r-wise s-union family, that is, a family of sequences with n components of non-negative integers such that for any r sequences in A the total sum of the maximum of each component in those sequences is at most s. We determine the maximum size of A and its unique extremal configuration provided (i) n is sufficiently large for fixed r and s, or (ii) n = r + 1.
“…Much research has been done for the case of families in {0, 1} n , and there are many challenging open problems. The interested reader is referred to [2,3,4,8,9].…”
Abstract. Let A ⊂ N n be an r-wise s-union family, that is, a family of sequences with n components of non-negative integers such that for any r sequences in A the total sum of the maximum of each component in those sequences is at most s. We determine the maximum size of A and its unique extremal configuration provided (i) n is sufficiently large for fixed r and s, or (ii) n = r + 1.
“…The problem of determining m(n, k, r, t) goes back to Erdős, Ko and Rado [4], and is still wide open. All known results, e.g., [1,[4][5][6][7]12,[22][23][24][25][26][27]29], suggest m(n, k, r, t) = max A (n, k, r, t) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But Theorem 8 would be useful to prove (2) (if true) or its product version for the cases 1 as well. In fact, this technique was used in [25][26][27] to get partial results of (2).…”
Let F 1 , . . . , F r ⊂ [n] k be r-cross t-intersecting, that is, |F 1 ∩ · · · ∩ F r | t holds for all F 1 ∈ F 1 , . . . , F r ∈ F r . We prove that for every p, μ ∈ (0, 1) there exists r 0 such that for all r > r 0 , all t with 1 t < (1/p − μ) r−1 /(1 − p) − 1, there exist n 0 and so that if n > n 0 and |k/n − p| < , then |F 1 | · · · |F r | n−t k−t r .
“…(But G 1 is not always optimal for w 0 , for example, we have w 0 (n, p, r, 1) > w p (G 1 (n, r, 1)) if p > 1 2 and r ≤ 5, see [28].) More results for m 0 (n, k, r,t) with k/n ≈ 1/2, and w 0 (n, p, r,t) with p ≈ 1/2 are found in [17,28,29].…”
Section: G(n Rt) = {G ⊂ 2 [N] : G Is R-wise T-intersecting}mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Frankl [8] showed m(n, k, r, 1) = |F 0 (n, k, r, 1)| if (r − 1)n ≥ rk. Partial results for the cases r ≥ 3 and t ≥ 2 are found in [14,16,24,26,27,23,29]. All known results suggest m(n, k, r,t) = max i |F i (n, k, r,t)|.…”
Section: N Rt) = {G ⊂ [N] : |G ∩ [T + Ri]| ≥ T + (R − 1)i} F I (Nmentioning
ABSTRACT. Let m(n, k, r,t) be the maximum size of F ⊂ [n] k satisfying |F 1 ∩· · ·∩F r | ≥ t for all F 1 , . . . , F r ∈ F . We report some known results about m (n, k, r,t). The random walk method introduced by Frankl is a strong tool to investigate m (n, k, r,t). Using a concrete example, we explain the method and how to use it.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.