2019
DOI: 10.1109/jiot.2018.2871445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Spatial Diversity in WiFi-Based Human Activity Recognition: A Deep Learning-Based Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, SignFi [94] exploited the CSI signals of WiFi and was able to identify 276 sign language gestures including the head, arm, hand, and finger with CNN for classification. Wang et al [95] analyzed the impact patterns of moving humans on the WiFi signals and leveraged a combined CNN and LSTM to recognize different gestures and activities. Such method can be used for remote control of home devices such as lights and televisions [118].…”
Section: ) Smart Homementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, SignFi [94] exploited the CSI signals of WiFi and was able to identify 276 sign language gestures including the head, arm, hand, and finger with CNN for classification. Wang et al [95] analyzed the impact patterns of moving humans on the WiFi signals and leveraged a combined CNN and LSTM to recognize different gestures and activities. Such method can be used for remote control of home devices such as lights and televisions [118].…”
Section: ) Smart Homementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Wi-Fi signal-based spatial diversity aware non-contact activity recognition system (Wi-SDAR) was introduced. It overshadows the dead zones with only one physical Wi-Fi sender and receiver, which is fully compatible with commercial off-the-shelf Wi-Fi devices [ 53 ]. HAR uses radar as a sensor having unique characteristics such as contactless sensing and privacy protection.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wi-Fi sensing using commercial hardware is widely used because it is an inexpensive and easily available solution. Human activities have been monitored and classified in existing research by ML and DL algorithms having accuracies over 90% [ 28 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ]. The average accuracy of promising non-contact technologies for monitoring human activities is shown in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research work published in [19] have presented human detection using non-linear techniques to extract CSI by examining the amounts of non-linear correlations between subcarriers. The work of [20] made use spatial diversity based on Wi-Fi to extract the CSI of human present in the dead zone. Some authors have also considered CSI based Wi-Fi signal in fall detection areas.…”
Section: Channel State Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%