2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00243-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-site treatment and landfilling of MSWI air pollution control residues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results for S were expected, because S was added as FeSO 4 as a part of the treatment and in highest quantities in the case of SD (see Table 1). A comparison of the achieved results with the laboratory studies reported in Jensen et al 8 and Lundtorp et al 9,10 shows that the leaching properties are the same even though the process has been developed with changes in both the process and the scale. This indicates that the leaching properties of treated residues are very robust and only slightly affected by variations in the process.…”
Section: Leaching From Solidsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results for S were expected, because S was added as FeSO 4 as a part of the treatment and in highest quantities in the case of SD (see Table 1). A comparison of the achieved results with the laboratory studies reported in Jensen et al 8 and Lundtorp et al 9,10 shows that the leaching properties are the same even though the process has been developed with changes in both the process and the scale. This indicates that the leaching properties of treated residues are very robust and only slightly affected by variations in the process.…”
Section: Leaching From Solidsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…[8][9][10] The process is based on the established facts that many trace metals in natural environments, such as those in soils and sediments, are bound to iron oxides 11 and that engineered iron oxides are able to bind substantial amounts of trace metals. 12 In the Ferrox process, the alkaline APC residue is mixed with an FeSO 4 solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5): (1) Washing processes: The objective in this case is generally to remove the soluble salts by using water as a leachant. This process may be used as a first step in more elaborate methodologies (Chimenos et al, 2005;Mangialardi, 2003;Piantone et al, 2003;Nzihou and Sharrock, 2002;Krebs et al, 2001;Lundtorp et al, 2003;Derie, 1996;Mulder, 1996). Kirby and Rimstidt (1994) studied the dominant chemical reactions between water and a mixture of ESP and bottom ash (BA), and concluded that 10 kg of anhydrous salts can be obtained from a tonne of waste.…”
Section: Separation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of leachate characteristics associated with ash monofills is given in Table 1. 15,[23][24][25] As shown, there is wide variability among and within facilities due to differences in waste sources and processing of the ash and local hydrology; however, in all cases, the dominant dissolved constituents are sodium, potassium, calcium, chloride, and sulfate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%