The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
1985
DOI: 10.1109/tr.1985.5222124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Shrinkage Estimation of the Exponential Scale Parameter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A value of K near to one implies strong belief in sample values. If K is not known, Pandey (1983) suggested two shrunken estimators for θ as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A value of K near to one implies strong belief in sample values. If K is not known, Pandey (1983) suggested two shrunken estimators for θ as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1.5) Pandey (1983) has shown that Tj, (j = 3, 4) have smaller MSE than MMSE estimator T1 if |r| ≤ 0.3, where r = {(θ0/θ) − 1}. Pandey and Srivastava (1985) proposed an estimator for θ as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Perhaps the most popular technique that utilizes the knowledge of point guess is the shrinkage technique, originally suggested by Thompson (1968). He suggested shrinking the usual estimator suggested by Pandey and Srivastava (1985) and Pandey and Upadhyay (1988). Their technique chooses a subfamily from a family of priors such that the mean of the prior distribution is equal to 0 θ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%