2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2009.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On ruin probability and aggregate claim representations for Pareto claim size distributions

Abstract: We generalize an integral representation for the ruin probability in a Crámer-Lundberg risk model with shifted (or also called US-)Pareto claim sizes, obtained by Ramsay [14], to classical Pareto(a) claim size distributions with arbitrary real values a > 1 and derive its asymptotic expansion. Furthermore an integral representation for the tail of compound sums of Pareto-distributed claims is obtained and numerical illustrations of its performance in comparison to other aggregate claim approximations are provid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the direct evaluation of 1 −L f (s) for |s| small is numerically not stable (column TWS14), so we use the simple identity 1 −L f (s) = e s (1 − αs α Γ(−α, s)) + (1 − e s ) and evaluate (1 − αs α Γ(−α, s)) with the series of Formula 6.5.29 of Abramowitz & Stegun [2] (truncated after sufficiently many summands, cf. also Albrecher & Kortschak [3]). For the term (1 − e s ) we use a series expansion as well.…”
Section: Us-pareto Distributionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the direct evaluation of 1 −L f (s) for |s| small is numerically not stable (column TWS14), so we use the simple identity 1 −L f (s) = e s (1 − αs α Γ(−α, s)) + (1 − e s ) and evaluate (1 − αs α Γ(−α, s)) with the series of Formula 6.5.29 of Abramowitz & Stegun [2] (truncated after sufficiently many summands, cf. also Albrecher & Kortschak [3]). For the term (1 − e s ) we use a series expansion as well.…”
Section: Us-pareto Distributionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For the case of evaluating ψ(u), we get that at leastL ψ (s) → 0 for s → ∞ andL ψ (s) is meromorphic with infinitely many poles in D, whose residuals go to zero exponentially fast as u → ∞, cf. Albrecher & Kortschak [3]. Also, the limit at the negative real axis exists.…”
Section: Pareto Distributionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This has turned out to be difficult. Practical computation algorithms have been developed for claim sizes with different versions of the pure Pareto distribution; see [17,18] and [1]. Our approach for calculating the ruin probability will apply to a wide range of levels of u and to a wide variety of claim size distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be done by complex analysis techniques in an analogous way as in Albrecher and Kortschak (2009) and one arrives at the mixing density…”
Section: Example 25 (Dependent Gamma Claims)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then (4) applies and one still has the freedom to choose the mixing distribution of Θ to identify a number of formulas for different dependence structures and marginals. However, this is only of limited usefulness, as for Pareto distributed claims there is no fully explicit formula for ψ θ (u) available (but see Ramsay, 2003 andKortschak, 2009 for integral representations of ψ θ (u)).…”
Section: Example 25 (Dependent Gamma Claims)mentioning
confidence: 99%