2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10898-016-0439-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On relaxing the integrality of the allocation variables of the reliability fixed-charge location problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the fixed charges for both the FCTP and SFCTP are incurred as a result of the use of a route from a supply point, facility location costs are incurred due to siting or opening of facilities before any shipping are done through the routes [20]. Facility location fixed charge as described by [21] is therefore a longer horizon decision and different from the route selection fixed charge. Merging this with FCTP or SFCTP gives a problem that seeks to optimize both Facility Location Problem (FLP) and Step-Fixed Charge Transportation Problem (SFCTP) decisions together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the fixed charges for both the FCTP and SFCTP are incurred as a result of the use of a route from a supply point, facility location costs are incurred due to siting or opening of facilities before any shipping are done through the routes [20]. Facility location fixed charge as described by [21] is therefore a longer horizon decision and different from the route selection fixed charge. Merging this with FCTP or SFCTP gives a problem that seeks to optimize both Facility Location Problem (FLP) and Step-Fixed Charge Transportation Problem (SFCTP) decisions together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Row 1 and Row 2 are partially utilized→ Step (3c.2). Row selection for perturbation Step (3e.1) Row 4, has 𝑋 41 = 5 at largest 𝐶 𝑖𝑗 = 𝐶 43 and also load at 𝑋 43 = 20 →Step (3e.2).Step (3e.2) Remove allocation at 𝑋 41 = 5 and add to position 𝑋21 Remove allocation at 𝑋 43 = 20 also, but no capacity to accommodate move at position 𝑋 21 . Row 1 is selected next in the decreasing order to receive 𝑋 43 = 20 →Step (3f).Step (3f).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%