2011
DOI: 10.1515/lity.2011.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On phonemic diversity and the origin of language in Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results clarify two objections that have been raised against Atkinson's proposal of a phonemic serial founder effect [ 5 ]. First, as noted by Pericliev [ 38 ], ‘one wonders why the number of phonemes must diminish in a founder population (…) A group of people will quite probably carry the WHOLE phonemic inventory to the new place of residence, and not only part of this inventory’ (see also pp. 150–151 in the criticism by Bybee [ 39 ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results clarify two objections that have been raised against Atkinson's proposal of a phonemic serial founder effect [ 5 ]. First, as noted by Pericliev [ 38 ], ‘one wonders why the number of phonemes must diminish in a founder population (…) A group of people will quite probably carry the WHOLE phonemic inventory to the new place of residence, and not only part of this inventory’ (see also pp. 150–151 in the criticism by Bybee [ 39 ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These discrepancies notwithstanding, it is important to note that Atkinson's analysis has not held up to scientific scrutiny. See the technical comments and reanalyses in Science (Cysouw, Dediu, and Moran 2012;Van Tuyl and Pereltsvaig 2012;Wang et al 2012) and in Linguistic Typology (Bybee 2011;Dahl 2011;Donohue and Nichols 2011;Jaeger et al 2011;Maddieson et al 2011;Pericliev 2011;Ringe 2011;Ross and Donohue 2011;Sproat 2011) . In summary, the main criticisms and issues are:…”
Section: Theoretical Objectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Large communities sizes favor medium size phoneme inventories -Small community sizes favor either small or large phoneme inventories Trudgill maintains that one should not expect to find a meaningful correlation between phoneme inventory size and population size given what is known about phonological change. Pericliev (2004) tests the observations by Trudgill (2004) and whether there is a positive correlation between speaker community size and phoneme inventory size using the UPSID sample of 451 languages (Maddieson and Precoda 1990) together with modern day population figures from the Ethnologue. Pericliev finds no correlation between the size of a community speaking a language and the size of the phonological inventory of that language.…”
Section: There Is No Positive Correlation Between Population Size Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pericliev [ 33 ], Sproat [ 29 ] and Bowern [ 34 ] raised concerns about the application of a SFE to explain the global phonemic cline, because of a lack of direct analogy between phonemes and genes. Indeed, the same language is shared by all individuals of a population, but they do not have the same genes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%