2005
DOI: 10.1515/156939205776368887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On minimal π-circuits of closing contacts for symmetric functions with threshold 2

Abstract: In this paper, we study the complexity of realisation of monotone symmetric functions of algebra of logic with threshold 2 by -circuits of closing contacts. We find the precise value of this complexity and construct the corresponding minimal circuits both in the case of unit weights of all contacts and in the case where contacts of distinct variables may be of distinct weights.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Apart from purely combinatorial considerations, the interest in this problem is motivated by its applications in formula and switching-circuit complexity of the Boolean threshold-2 function (which takes on the value 1 if and only if at least two of its inputs are set to 1). For more context, see treatments by Radhakrishnan [33] and Lozhkin [26]. Our lower bound is obtained in a slightly more restrictive setting, because of explicit asymmetry: for OR 2 (T n ), one needs to cover entries (i, j) with i < j in the matrix; in biclique coverings of undirected graphs, it suffices to cover either of (i, j) and (j, i).…”
Section: Discussion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Apart from purely combinatorial considerations, the interest in this problem is motivated by its applications in formula and switching-circuit complexity of the Boolean threshold-2 function (which takes on the value 1 if and only if at least two of its inputs are set to 1). For more context, see treatments by Radhakrishnan [33] and Lozhkin [26]. Our lower bound is obtained in a slightly more restrictive setting, because of explicit asymmetry: for OR 2 (T n ), one needs to cover entries (i, j) with i < j in the matrix; in biclique coverings of undirected graphs, it suffices to cover either of (i, j) and (j, i).…”
Section: Discussion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%