2006
DOI: 10.1080/02841860500417486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On metronomic chemotherapy: Modulation of angiogenesis mediated by VEGE-A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…acting on the microtubules. We have previously reported that metronomic paclitaxel treatment (19 mg/kg/week) for 7 days in rats results in a strong antiangiogenic response, with VA reduced to 44% and MVL to 61% of controls [3]. This is an almost identical antiangiogenic response to that seen in response to 2.0 mg/kg/ week of vinblastine presented here.…”
Section: Angiogenesis Variablessupporting
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…acting on the microtubules. We have previously reported that metronomic paclitaxel treatment (19 mg/kg/week) for 7 days in rats results in a strong antiangiogenic response, with VA reduced to 44% and MVL to 61% of controls [3]. This is an almost identical antiangiogenic response to that seen in response to 2.0 mg/kg/ week of vinblastine presented here.…”
Section: Angiogenesis Variablessupporting
confidence: 68%
“…infusion) using several chemotherapeutics of various classes in the same experimental setting, the very strong antiangiogenic effects exerted by vinblastine, as observed here, with a statistically significant reduction in both microvessel spatial extension (vascularized area, VA) and density (microvessel length, MVL), have previously only been observed following treatment with paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide, but at doses that affected the physiologic body-weight gain to a lesser degree [3]. It is noteworthy that the present model compares well with other in vivo angiogenesis models in terms of biological, technical and ethical features and that differences in outcome between in vivo angiogenesis models should not be entirely unexpected because of differences in test tissue, species, experimental performance and measuring power [24].…”
Section: Angiogenesis Variablesmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations