In differential diagnosis of soft tissue tumors located at this specific site, elastofibroma should be considered as likely diagnosis. Due to its benign behaviour, the tumor should be resected only in symptomatic patients.

Primary sarcoma of the breast is an extremely rare and heterogeneous disease. The rarity of this tumour limits most studies to small retrospective case reviews and case reports and has made clinicopathological study difficult. This article reviews the current literature on the diagnosis and management of breast sarcoma. The optimal treatment of breast sarcoma involves a multidisciplinary team prior to the initiation of treatment. Patients with tumours less than 5 cm that are easily resectable should undergo complete resection to the extent required to provide negative surgical margins. Negative surgical margins are more important for local recurrence and overall survival than the extent of surgical resection. Thus, neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in order to shrink the tumour and help obtain negative surgical margins. Whether chemotherapy is indicated is primarily determined by tumour size. There is evidence that tumours larger than 5 cm are associated with an elevated risk of systemic failure and a poor prognosis. After surgical resection, patients with chemosensitive tumours should undergo additional adjuvant chemotherapy to treat micrometastatic disease. Radiation therapy should be used to improve local control in cases in which the tumour is larger than 5 cm and in cases with positive surgical margins. We propose to treat the patients according to the clinical practice guidelines in use for soft tissue sarcomas and address them to a reference centre for sarcoma. The appropriate treatment of breast sarcoma requires a multidisciplinary team approach necessitating experienced sarcoma surgeons, pathologists, radiotherapists and medical oncologists. Treating rare tumours in the same place should permit us to standardise pathological data and to include patients into multicentric radiotherapy or chemotherapy protocols to improve overall survival.

BackgroundWound infection is a common complication in diabetic patients. The progressive spread of infections and development of drug-resistant strains underline the need for further insights into bacterial behavior in the host in order to develop new therapeutic strategies. The aim of our study was to develop a large animal model suitable for monitoring the development and effect of bacterial infections in diabetic wounds.MethodsFourteen excisional wounds were created on the dorsum of diabetic and non-diabetic Yorkshire pigs and sealed with polyurethane chambers. Wounds were either inoculated with 2 × 108 Colony-Forming Units (CFU) of Staphylococcus aureus or injected with 0.9% sterile saline. Blood glucose was monitored daily, and wound fluid was collected for bacterial quantification and measurement of glucose concentration. Tissue biopsies for microbiological and histological analysis were performed at days 4, 8, and 12. Wounds were assessed for reepithelialization and wound contraction.ResultsDiabetic wounds showed a sustained significant infection (>105 CFU/g tissue) compared to non-diabetic wounds (p < 0.05) over the whole time course of the experiment. S. aureus-inoculated diabetic wounds showed tissue infection with up to 8 × 107 CFU/g wound tissue. Non-diabetic wounds showed high bacterial counts at day 4 followed by a decrease and no apparent infection at day 12. Epidermal healing in S. aureus-inoculated diabetic wounds showed a significant delay compared with non-inoculated diabetic wounds (59% versus 84%; p < 0.05) and were highly significant compared with healing in non-diabetic wounds (97%; p < 0.001).ConclusionDiabetic wounds developed significantly more sustained infection than non-diabetic wounds. S. aureus inoculation leads to invasive infection and significant wound healing delay and promotes invasive co-infection with endogenous bacteria. This novel wound healing model provides the opportunity to closely assess infections during diabetic wound healing and to monitor the effect of therapeutical agents in vivo.