2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-line verification of current-state opacity by Petri nets and integer linear programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tokens are placed in places and tokens represent the things that will flow through the system. [20][21][22][23][24][25][82][83][84] graphically represented by a bipartite graph, where P and T are finite sets of places and transitions, respectively. P [ T 6 ¼ ; and P \ T = ;.…”
Section: Petri Netsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tokens are placed in places and tokens represent the things that will flow through the system. [20][21][22][23][24][25][82][83][84] graphically represented by a bipartite graph, where P and T are finite sets of places and transitions, respectively. P [ T 6 ¼ ; and P \ T = ;.…”
Section: Petri Netsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Petri nets have found extensive applications to industrial systems such as deadlock analysis and solution, [8][9][10] supervisory control, [11][12][13][14] implementation 15 and scheduling, [16][17][18][19] and fault analysis. [20][21][22][23] As an important mathematical tool of discrete event systems, 24,25 Petri nets are found to be the most suitable language to do such analyses due to the availability of many existing analysis tools. However, a mapping between BPMN and Petri nets can be defined for semantic analysis in order to check the correctness of a BPMN model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automata are intuitive models used to achieve the original contributions and most of the subsequent developments in the literature of supervisory control of DESs [20], [50]. Meanwhile, with the development of DESs, Petri nets (PNs) have become a conceptual framework and a fundamental model for DESs since they are widely used to address various classes of problems, including the formal representation and development of systems, along with their supervisory control [9], [10], [17], [49], [55], controller synthesis or design [22], [23], [34], [47], state estimation and observability [2], [14], [36], fault detection, diagnosis, and prognosis [11], [16], [19], [25], [37], [48], [56], [57], diagnosability [3], [8], [40], [41], opacity [12], [13], [46],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petri nets, a formal modeling tool invented by CA Petri, 1 have been applied to many fields, such as control of discrete event systems, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] system reliability analysis, [18][19][20][21][22][23] modeling, analysis, control, [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and the verification of communication protocol. 34 In the analysis of Petri nets, state-space techniques are used in marking reachability, forbidden states including deadlock control, [35][36][37] opacity verification and enforcement, and fault diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%