2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-1524(00)00033-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-line tuning strategy for model predictive controllers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ghazzawi, A et al (2010) introduced an online tuning strategy that will re-tune the controller in real time, based on the predicted closed loop controlled variable response. Acceptable dynamic limits are set on setpoint changes and disturbance rejection.…”
Section: Recent Developments In Dmc Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghazzawi, A et al (2010) introduced an online tuning strategy that will re-tune the controller in real time, based on the predicted closed loop controlled variable response. Acceptable dynamic limits are set on setpoint changes and disturbance rejection.…”
Section: Recent Developments In Dmc Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve that goal, a methodology for adjusting the predefined performance specification will be used. The methodologies for triggering the algorithm and adjusting the performance specification online are presented in detail in (Al-Ghazzawi et al, 2001). …”
Section: Activation Of the Online Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, Al-Ghazzawi et al (2001) proposed an online adaptive strategy for constrained MPC. The algorithm utilizes the gradients of the closed-loop response with respect to the parameters to automatically determine online the new values of the parameters that drive the predicted output inside predefined time-domain constraints.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They set the conditioning number of the hessian of the DMC control problem equal to 500, which represents a good compromise between performance and robustness, and approximate the system model by first order plus dead time transfer functions, to develop analytical tuning expressions for the entries of matrix R. Liu and Wang (2000) considered the minimization of the sensitivity functions between the tuning parameters and the closedloop performance as the goals of a mixed-integer nonlinear optimization problem. Al-Ghazzawi et al (2001) defined the tuning goals in terms of the closed-loop output constraining envelopes, and a linear approximation of the process dynamics allowed the authors to obtain analytical sensitivity functions for Q y and R for constrained MPCs. When the constraints are active, sensitivity functions are calculated based on the Lagrange multipliers of the active constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%