Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-2615(98)00041-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-line timetable re-scheduling in regional train services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar problem is the focus of [1]. The MIP model presented is considered to be too complicated to solve in real-time, and the authors adopt a more practical heuristic approach.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar problem is the focus of [1]. The MIP model presented is considered to be too complicated to solve in real-time, and the authors adopt a more practical heuristic approach.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is di cult to determine the optimum solutions to industry-sized problems in a reasonable time, and this raises the need for e cient heuristic and meta-heuristic algorithms. In the related literature, several sophisticated search procedures are introduced, such as look-ahead search [8], backtracking search [9], and meta-heuristics algorithms [10][11][12]. D'ariano et al [13] addressed the real-time train scheduling problem in a railway network using an e cient Branch and Bound (B&B) algorithm.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consideration was given to the ways in which a journey might suffer a setback. This resulted in a set of journey breakdown scenarios as shown in Table 3 (see Adenso-Diaz et al 1999 for another list of possible incidents leading to rescheduling, or Higgins and Kozan 1998 for different delay types). An interpretation of the likely consequences, recovery options, and information needs for each scenario is also given in Table 3.…”
Section: Journey Breakdownsmentioning
confidence: 99%