Intl J Robust & Nonlinear
 1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1239(19991215)9:14<1033::aid-rnc451>3.0.co;2-#
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

On‐line system identification for aircraft with distributed control effectors

James Buffington
1
,
P. Chandler
2
,
Meir Pachter
3
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
38
12
0
0

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
24
16
7

Relationship

0
47

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 47 publications

(25 citation statements)
references

References 10 publications

0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a number of solutions available to solve this problem, such as, direct control allocation (Durham, 1994), daisy chainging (J. M. Buffington & Enns, 1996) or constrained linear programming(J. Buffington, Chandler, & Pachter, 1999;Svendsen et al, 2012). In this work, active set control allocation is used (Harkegard, 2002).…”
Section: -5 Active Set Control Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…There are a number of solutions available to solve this problem, such as, direct control allocation (Durham, 1994), daisy chainging (J. M. Buffington & Enns, 1996) or constrained linear programming(J. Buffington, Chandler, & Pachter, 1999;Svendsen et al, 2012). In this work, active set control allocation is used (Harkegard, 2002).…”
Section: -5 Active Set Control Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…Control Allocation (CA) has emerged as one of the most studied techniques when dealing with such problems (e.g., Enns, 1998;Bošković and Mehra, 2002;Buffington et al, 1999;Davidson et al, 2001). One benefit of using a CA structure for fault tolerant control is that the controller remains the same and the control effort is distributed to all available actuators without reconfiguration.…”
Section: Fault Tolerant Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…One of the challenges of using traditional control ideas for systems with redundancy, i.e., over-actuated systems, is how to deal with these additional degrees of freedom. Control Allocation (CA) has emerged as one of the most studied techniques when dealing with such problems (e.g., Enns, 1998;Bošković and Mehra, 2002;Buffington et al, 1999;Davidson et al, 2001). One benefit of using a CA structure for fault tolerant control is that the controller remains the same and the control effort is distributed to all available actuators without reconfiguration.…”
Section: Fault Tolerant Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
scite logo

Scite is an AI-powered platform that helps researchers discover and evaluate scientific literature through Smart Citations, showing whether studies support or contradict a claim. Now part of Research Solutions, Scite has indexed 1.6B+ citations, partners with 30+ publishers, and serves 2M users worldwide.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Status

Copyright © 2026 Scite LLC. All rights reserved.

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Research Solutions Logo