2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.csl.2004.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-line experimental methods to evaluate text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis: effects of voice gender and signal quality on intelligibility, naturalness and preference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sex differences lead to intelligibility differences in noise (Kilic and Ogut, 2004;Stevens et al, 2005) and can be cause for particular concern under military noise conditions, such as in loud cockpits (Nixon et al, 1998). It is critical to know if demographic effects found in AC systems operate similarly in BC systems (McBride et al, 2008a).…”
Section: B Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Sex differences lead to intelligibility differences in noise (Kilic and Ogut, 2004;Stevens et al, 2005) and can be cause for particular concern under military noise conditions, such as in loud cockpits (Nixon et al, 1998). It is critical to know if demographic effects found in AC systems operate similarly in BC systems (McBride et al, 2008a).…”
Section: B Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, intelligibility of TTS synthesis is affected by both the gender of the voice and the quality of the signal affect (Stevens, Lees, Vonwiller, and Burnham, 2005). Previous studies have also indicated that synthetic speech perception in listeners without disabilities is also dependent on listening conditions (Koul & Allen, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Despite the limitations of the experimental setting, this series of experiments represents a comprehensive usability evaluation of the use of TTS in the context of a real-world application that is not often evident in other research in this area (as suggested by Stevens et al, 2005). The results are in agreement with previous research in a computer aided language learning (CALL) application (Handley, 2009), in which a sample of seventeen language professionals (teachers and researchers) rated the adequacy and acceptability of various TTS systems for use in a variety of teaching roles (e.g.…”
Section: Number Of Versionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the evaluation of TTS systems, many empirical evaluations focus on the acceptability, naturalness and comprehensibility of the systems (Stern et al, 1999;Stevens et al, 2005;Viswanathan and Viswanathan, 2005). Such research focuses on the comprehension or acceptability of TTS as a speech solution, that is, assessing TTS system prompts solely from a quality perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%