1995
DOI: 10.1016/0890-6955(95)93041-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-line error compensation of coordinate measuring machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The component error functions can be acquired from the repetitively measured data by considering the statistical distribution of the residual errors [15]. Fig.5 shows an example of extracting the repeatable error function from the repetitively measured straightness error data on a high precision machine.…”
Section: Newly Proposed Compensation Methods For Machine Tool Motion Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The component error functions can be acquired from the repetitively measured data by considering the statistical distribution of the residual errors [15]. Fig.5 shows an example of extracting the repeatable error function from the repetitively measured straightness error data on a high precision machine.…”
Section: Newly Proposed Compensation Methods For Machine Tool Motion Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with one setup, the laser interferometer system can only measure one error element, and the optic setup and laser-path alignment is time consuming before every measurement task. Thus, some developed methods and measuring systems have worked to measure multiple geometric errors simultaneously to speed up the calibration [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Most of them need a complex optical setup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, investigation has been carried by Ren et al [11] CMM. In fact, an online error compensation system based on three laser optical multi-degree-of-freedom measurement systems (MDFM systems) for CMMs has been presented by Huang and Ni [13]. This system provided flexibility to measure error components by using both on-line and off-line measurement methods.…”
Section: Measurement Uncertainties Associated With Cmmmentioning
confidence: 99%