“…(2.5), since generally cost and mass forces are proportional to weight. Starting from the two limit analysis theorems, two distinct primal formulations of the optimum plastic design can be derived [6]. We consider now only the statical theorem, reserving for a future paper the consideration of the kinematical one.…”
Section: Mass Forces Versus Design Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2.4) contemplate also the case of technological conslraints [6], [7], [8]. In this case the n finite elements are collected in m < n groups, each being composed of elements whose plastic resistances are in some way linked to each other, and the matrix V has m instead of n blocks.…”
Section: Plastic Resistances Versus Design Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first three conditions (3.3) say that the/an optimum design is a statically admissible one. Comparing then (3.4,a,c) with (2.1) and (2.3,b and d), the vectors x(~f +, y(r)* can be respectively qualified as velocity vector fi*m and strain rate intensity vector 2,*(r) relative to the rth load set (see [6], [7], [10]). Hence calling d an arbitrary positive constant, we can write: In other words, an optimum dedgn p* is characterized as //,at statically admissibk design with which it is possible to associate, for every load set, a compatibk strain rate vector, each s,,tisfying the flow-law rules (Eqs.…”
Section: Mass Forces Versus Design Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work quoted above in [6] assumes a discrete model with lumped deformability. This paper is intended to generalize some results given first in [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conformity and uniformity are different physical meanings of a single mathematical model, which is able to describe both the plastic flowing and the design growing processes. Uniformity, as characterization of optimum design, once again appears to be a generalization of the uniform enerel' dissipation principle of Drucker and Shield [11], provided that this is applied to a special mechanism (Foulkes mechanism [6], [12]), which generally is not an actual collapse mechanism.…”
“…(2.5), since generally cost and mass forces are proportional to weight. Starting from the two limit analysis theorems, two distinct primal formulations of the optimum plastic design can be derived [6]. We consider now only the statical theorem, reserving for a future paper the consideration of the kinematical one.…”
Section: Mass Forces Versus Design Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2.4) contemplate also the case of technological conslraints [6], [7], [8]. In this case the n finite elements are collected in m < n groups, each being composed of elements whose plastic resistances are in some way linked to each other, and the matrix V has m instead of n blocks.…”
Section: Plastic Resistances Versus Design Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first three conditions (3.3) say that the/an optimum design is a statically admissible one. Comparing then (3.4,a,c) with (2.1) and (2.3,b and d), the vectors x(~f +, y(r)* can be respectively qualified as velocity vector fi*m and strain rate intensity vector 2,*(r) relative to the rth load set (see [6], [7], [10]). Hence calling d an arbitrary positive constant, we can write: In other words, an optimum dedgn p* is characterized as //,at statically admissibk design with which it is possible to associate, for every load set, a compatibk strain rate vector, each s,,tisfying the flow-law rules (Eqs.…”
Section: Mass Forces Versus Design Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work quoted above in [6] assumes a discrete model with lumped deformability. This paper is intended to generalize some results given first in [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conformity and uniformity are different physical meanings of a single mathematical model, which is able to describe both the plastic flowing and the design growing processes. Uniformity, as characterization of optimum design, once again appears to be a generalization of the uniform enerel' dissipation principle of Drucker and Shield [11], provided that this is applied to a special mechanism (Foulkes mechanism [6], [12]), which generally is not an actual collapse mechanism.…”
The optimal design of plane beam structures made of elastic perfectly plastic material is studied according to the shakedown criterion. The design problem is formulated by means of a statical approach on the grounds of the shakedown lower bound theorem, and by means of a kinematical approach on the grounds of the shakedown upper bound theorem. In both cases two different types of design problems are formulated: one searches for the minimum volume design whose shakedown limit load is assigned; the other searches for the design of the assigned volume whose shakedown limit load is maximum. The optimality conditions of the four problems above are found by the use of a variational approach; such conditions prove the equivalence of the two types of design problems, provide useful information on the structural behaviour in optimality conditions, and constitute a fifth possible way to determine the optimal design. Whatever approach is used, the strong non-linearity of the corresponding problem does not allow the finding of the analytical solution. Consequently, in the application stage suitable numerical procedures must be employed. Two numerical examples are given.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.