Optimization and Artificial Intelligence in Civil and Structural Engineering 1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-2490-6_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification and Comparison of LP Formulations for the Plastic Design of Frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason that this kinematic program is chosen to be solved is that, for its solution using the simplex method, it is the least demanding in terms of storage and computing time of any of the other linear programs that could be formulated by either using the force or the displacement method of analysis (Munro 1979, Tam andJennings 1989). Once the solution of the above program is obtained for the current iteration, the simplex multipliers of its optimal solution give directly a set of design variables M H p and a set of p r , which are then used for the next iteration.…”
Section: Optimal Shakedown Design Using the Force Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason that this kinematic program is chosen to be solved is that, for its solution using the simplex method, it is the least demanding in terms of storage and computing time of any of the other linear programs that could be formulated by either using the force or the displacement method of analysis (Munro 1979, Tam andJennings 1989). Once the solution of the above program is obtained for the current iteration, the simplex multipliers of its optimal solution give directly a set of design variables M H p and a set of p r , which are then used for the next iteration.…”
Section: Optimal Shakedown Design Using the Force Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%