IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics 2014
DOI: 10.1109/btas.2014.6996300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On latent fingerprint minutiae extraction using stacked denoising sparse AutoEncoders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extracting reliable features from latent fingerprints is a challenging task [34]. Given the ground truth minutiae annotations, the performance of a minutiae extraction algorithm can be evaluated with good confidence.…”
Section: • Latent Fingerprint Feature Extraction and Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extracting reliable features from latent fingerprints is a challenging task [34]. Given the ground truth minutiae annotations, the performance of a minutiae extraction algorithm can be evaluated with good confidence.…”
Section: • Latent Fingerprint Feature Extraction and Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to extra processing time and produce wrong orientation patches as mentioned by Yang et al [28]. To define a minutiae and non minutiae in latent fingerprint image, Anush et al [27] worked towards automatically finding the feature and non feature value in latent image using a spectral analysis method, which is a neural network base learning approach.…”
Section: B Modern Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Unlike existing works using plain convolutional neural network [21,22] or sliding window [18,3] to process each patch with fixed size and stride, we use a deeper residual learning based network with more pooling layers to scale down the region patch. Specifically, we get the output after the 2 nd , 3 rd , and 4 th pooling layer to feed to an ASPP network [2] with corresponding rates for multiscale segmentation.…”
Section: Segmentation and Orientation Feature Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of different methods for minutiae extraction on FVC 2004 and NIST SD27 datasets. Note that [18,21] reported their results only on subsets of FVC 2004 and NIST SD27 as mentioned in Table 1. " " means the authors neither provided these results in their paper nor made their code available.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%