2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14322-9_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Languages Piecewise Testable in the Strict Sense

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As with SL these are closed under intersection but not union, complement, concatenation or Kleene- * . And they form a proper hierarchy in k. The class of SP constraints was characterized by Rogers, et al [23]. Strikingly these are exactly the sets of strings that are closed under subsequence.…”
Section: Strictly Piecewise Testable Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with SL these are closed under intersection but not union, complement, concatenation or Kleene- * . And they form a proper hierarchy in k. The class of SP constraints was characterized by Rogers, et al [23]. Strikingly these are exactly the sets of strings that are closed under subsequence.…”
Section: Strictly Piecewise Testable Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of parameters, though, rises rapidly-the number of parameters of an LT k distribution is exponential in k. In application, the higher complexity models are likely to be infeasible. On the other hand, there is a complexity hierarchy that parallels the local hierarchy but which is based on precedence-order of symbols independent of the intervening material [23]-which also provides a basis for statistical models. The strictly piecewise distributions, those analogous to n-gram models, are both feasible and are capable of discriminating many longdistance dependencies [29].…”
Section: Statistical Models Of Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second generalization is similar to the phonological requirement that no word may contain more than one primary stress, which is strictly piecewise (SP; Heinz (2010), Rogers et al (2010)). SP grammars work exactly the same as SL grammar except that instead of illicit substrings they list illicit subsequences.…”
Section: Strictly Piecewisementioning
confidence: 98%