2014
DOI: 10.1177/0959354314540765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On interlistening and the idea of dialogue

Abstract: Among the many analytical categories bequeathed by linguistics to the study of dialogue, some inadvertently conceal more than they reveal. In addition to instantiating such fictions as speaker and listener or langue and parole, these categories tend to privilege the study of syntax over semantics, utterance over gesture, speaking over listening, and words over everything else. Moreover, our underlying models tend to depict dialogue spatially as a series of sequential exchanges between individual subjects where… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The activity of the dialogic self within a story, as a vicarious kind of social interaction, is potentially transformative for the reader (Bakhtin, 1981; Vygotsky, 1978). Furthermore, humans make meaning with others not only with language but also through gesture and image (Lipari, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activity of the dialogic self within a story, as a vicarious kind of social interaction, is potentially transformative for the reader (Bakhtin, 1981; Vygotsky, 1978). Furthermore, humans make meaning with others not only with language but also through gesture and image (Lipari, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the dimension in which things or elements of things envelop each other, whereas breadth and height are the dimensions in which they are juxtaposed. (Merleau-Ponty, 1945/1962 Both the spatial and temporal associations of Merleau-Ponty's use of "depth" resonate quite well with Lipari's (2014) notion of interlistening, I would argue.…”
Section: Conclusion: Toward An Ontology Of the In-betweenmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…For we must, as a result of hearing our talk, lead our listeners into undergoing a particular languaged experience, or a unique experience with language, if we are to occasion within them the thinking that can happen within us as we hear an old word used in a new context, or a new word used in an already familiar context. Lipari (2014) clearly realizes the importance of this. Hence her noting at the beginning of her article that:…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%