2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21107.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On how leakage can affect the star formation rate estimation using Hα luminosity

Abstract: We present observational evidence that leakage of ionizing photons from star‐forming regions can affect the quantification of the star formation rate (SFR) in galaxies. This effect could partially explain the differences between the SFR estimates using the far‐ultraviolet (FUV) and the Hα emission. We find that leakage could decrease the SFR(Hα)/SFR(FUV) ratio by up to 25 per cent. The evidence is based on the observation that the SFR(Hα)/SFR(FUV) ratio is lower for objects showing a shell Hα structure than fo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modelling effects of IMF variation using Hα or Hβ to UV flux ratios have strong dependence on the assumed SFH and dust extinction of the galaxies and is only sensitive to the upper end of the high mass IMF. Apart from IMF variation (Boselli et al 2009;Meurer et al 2009;Pflamm-Altenburg et al 2009), stochasticity in SFH (Boselli et al 2009;Fumagalli et al 2011;Guo et al 2016), non-constant SFHs (Weisz et al 2012), and Lyman leakage (Relaño et al 2012) can provide viable explanations to describe offsets between expected Balmer line to UV flux ratios and observed values. Kauffmann (2014) used SFRs derived via multiple nebular emission line analysis with the 4000Å break and Hδ A absorption to probe the recent SFHs of SDSS galaxies with log 10 (M * /M ) < 10 and infer possibilities for IMF variation.…”
Section: Investigating the Imf With Hα Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelling effects of IMF variation using Hα or Hβ to UV flux ratios have strong dependence on the assumed SFH and dust extinction of the galaxies and is only sensitive to the upper end of the high mass IMF. Apart from IMF variation (Boselli et al 2009;Meurer et al 2009;Pflamm-Altenburg et al 2009), stochasticity in SFH (Boselli et al 2009;Fumagalli et al 2011;Guo et al 2016), non-constant SFHs (Weisz et al 2012), and Lyman leakage (Relaño et al 2012) can provide viable explanations to describe offsets between expected Balmer line to UV flux ratios and observed values. Kauffmann (2014) used SFRs derived via multiple nebular emission line analysis with the 4000Å break and Hδ A absorption to probe the recent SFHs of SDSS galaxies with log 10 (M * /M ) < 10 and infer possibilities for IMF variation.…”
Section: Investigating the Imf With Hα Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leakage of ionising photons from galaxies is likely negligible, at the level of a few percent or less (e.g., Heckman et al 2011), although the jury is still out in the case of low-mass, low-density galaxies (Hunter et al 2010;Pellegrini et al 2012). Starforming regions within galaxies tend, on the other hand, to be leaky, and lose about 25%-40% of their ionising photons (see recent work by Pellegrini et al 2012;Relaño et al 2012;Crocker et al 2012). Thus, the use of ionising photon tracers for local SFRs may be biased downwards by about 1/3 of their true value because of this effect.…”
Section: Indicators Based On Ionised Gas Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the absorption of the hard radiation from the hot stars and subsequent re-emission as either recombination lines or dust continuum occurs far -at distances >100 pc, in the case of NGC 346-from the actual location of these stars. See also Relaño et al (2012) and Li et al (2013) for excellent discussions on how radiation escaping the local environment affects H α and dust emission as SFR tracers on small spatial scales. As a consequence, these indirect tracers which depend on absorption and re-emission, cannot be used for our present purpose, which is to relate the stellar densities with the ISM on smaller scales within the star forming complex.…”
Section: Star Formation Rate Surface Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%