1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00806806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On horizontal crustal strain in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We find no indication of deformation exceeding 3 mm/yr across the entire shield area. Our findings do not support the results of Kakkuri and Chen (1992), who used repeated optical triangulation and estimated deformations at levels of 1 cm/yr over 100 km. Their results appear too close to the standard deviation of 0.1 micro-strain per year to be considered as robust.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We find no indication of deformation exceeding 3 mm/yr across the entire shield area. Our findings do not support the results of Kakkuri and Chen (1992), who used repeated optical triangulation and estimated deformations at levels of 1 cm/yr over 100 km. Their results appear too close to the standard deviation of 0.1 micro-strain per year to be considered as robust.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The network would then observe primarily the elastically released strain of the crust, which is more evenly distributed. However, there is an open debate after propositions of large ratios between aseismically and coseismically released strain in the fault zones and even outside (Slunga, 1991) referring to results from triangulation and trilateration in Finland Kakkuri and Chen, 1992). Campaign-based GPS studies in Sweden claim motions of 1-3 mm/yr both at or below a 200 km scale (in the Scania province around the Törnquist zone, and across fault zones at the shield scale .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anholt is situated between the current 0 and 1 mm yr )1 isolines for vertical movement, whereas the station of sea-level measurements is located close to the 0 mm yr )1 isoline (Kakkuri and Chen, 1992). We assume that the total rebound of the modern coastal features we have studied does not exceed 0.03 m. Weak earthquakes are recorded in the Kattegat area (Gregersen et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this approach, variance for the relative location can be obtained by (Kakkuri and Chen 1992) du ¼ ðE þ wÞr þ t 0 (10) Figure 4. Location of the 30 object points having maximum displacement vectors.…”
Section: Strain Analysis Of Dammentioning
confidence: 99%