On Gender and Illiberalism: Lessons From Slovak Parliamentary Debates

Abstract

This study offers a comprehensive, in-depth analysis of Slovak illiberal anti-gender parliamentary discourse based on a unique dataset consisting of 85 parliamentary speeches. It presents who the main actors are in terms of the illiberal anti-gender discourse in Slovakia and which narratives they postulate. It also considers if there is any variation in the identified narratives. The qualitative content analysis covered several critical anti-gender narratives in the rhetoric of illiberal parties. I argue that the occurrence and range of anti-gender narratives within the Slovak parliamentary illiberal discourse are diverse, and this diversity varies in the ideological background of the analysed parties. While some of the more traditional Christian conservative parties, such as the KDH, and new populist parties such as OĽaNO or Sme Rodina, have articulated gender primarily as a threat to Slovak Catholics, Christianity, traditional marriage, and families, others like the nationally conservative-oriented SNS or the Smer-SD have stressed the loss of national sovereignty and legal aspects around the Istanbul Convention, and utilized this topic to strengthen their Eurosceptic rhetoric. Finally, the far-right K-ĽSNS has used an eclectic approach combining all found anti-gender narratives while using the most abusive language towards transgender persons and other sexual minorities.

“They attack the family and order”: Right-wing media about feminists and the political consequences of the women's strike in Poland

“…Personally, I prefer a liberal dictator to a democratic government lacking liberalism” (Szacki, 1994 , p. 191). This right-wing and anti-communist trait of East European liberalism makes it possible to better understand why right-wing populists can be neoliberal despite being described as “illiberal” [they restrict media freedom, attack the independence of the judiciary, fight independent civil society and use anti-gender rhetoric (Zvada, 2022 )]. The illiberal is not in conflict with the neoliberal.…”

Gendering De‐Democratization: Gender and Illiberalism in Post‐Communist Europe

“…In other words, a change from a feminist partner to a "hostile state" (Krizsán & Roggeband, 2021, p. 610). The contributions to this thematic issue show that in post-communist Eastern Europe, all three anti-gender gradations/manifestations can be found, from opposition to gender in Slovakia (Maďarová & Hardoš, 2022;Zvada, 2022), gender policy backsliding in Romania (Dragolea, 2022), to state anti-feminism in Poland (Grzebalska, 2022;Zbytniewska, 2022) and even more so Hungary (Linnamäki, 2022;Parti, 2022;Takács et al, 2022).…”

“…She observes a shift from gender traditionalism to an explicitly anti-gender discourse that is illiberal in nature. Zvada (2022) analyzes anti-gender rhetoric in the Slovak parliament. He finds that gender is primarily mentioned by illiberal parties, though with variation according to ideological background.…”

Anti-Corruption Attitudes in Post-Communist Slovakia “Hellfire and Deviance” or Political Socialization?

“…One possibly related development in the effort to stop public turpitude in Slovakia occurred after the unpopular and allegedly unethical Fico administration lost power in 2020 to a coalition of anti-corruption but generally socially conservative, church-linked 2 or religion-friendly parties led by Prime Minister Igor Matovič (Csanyi, 2020;Ondruška, 2022;Zvada, 2022). 3 This present-day situation suggests it may be worthwhile to see if religion could be useful in the fight against corruption as scholars such as Marquette (2012) have suggested previously.…”