1994
DOI: 10.1006/jmaa.1994.1192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Galerkin Approximations of a Quasilinear Nonpotential Elliptic Problem of a Nonmonotone Type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To conclude this section, we would like to point out that after this paper had been submitted for publication, it came to our attention that a similar (uniqueness) result had been given in [4]. However, there is no further discussion in [4] as we do in Section 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…To conclude this section, we would like to point out that after this paper had been submitted for publication, it came to our attention that a similar (uniqueness) result had been given in [4]. However, there is no further discussion in [4] as we do in Section 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…11.6] for a short proof of the uniqueness of the solution. In [22], the existence and the uniqueness of a weak solution of Problem (1) are shown for f ∈ L 2 (Ω ), with more general mixed Dirichlet-Neumann boundary conditions, on a bounded domain with a Lipschitz boundary. For the proof of the uniqueness, the divergence form of the differential operator is an essential ingredient.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are just a few uniqueness results in the case of sufficiently small data u, Brenner and Scott [2], pp. 188-191, or when the discretization parameter h is large enough, Hlaváček [9] and Hlaváček et al [10]. Moreover these papers assume the coefficient a(x, y) of the quasilinear equation to be bounded on Ω × R. In this case, we are able to prove the uniqueness of the solution of the discrete equation for every h small enough for any u ∈ L p (Ω) when p > n; see Corollary 3.3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%