2022
DOI: 10.1002/jcd.21852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On flag‐transitive 2‐(k2,k,λ) $({k}^{2},k,\lambda )$ designs with λ∣k $\lambda | k$

Abstract: It is shown that, apart from the smallest Ree group, a flag-transitive automorphism group G of a 2-k k λ ( , , ) 2 design , with λ k  , is either an affine group or an almost simple classical group. Moreover, when G is the smallest Ree group,  is isomorphic either to the 2-(6 , 6, 2) 2 design or to one of the three 2-(6 , 6, 6) 2 designs constructed in this paper. All the four 2-designs have the 36 secants of a non-degenerate conic  of PG (8) 2 as a point set and 6-sets of secants in a remarkable configura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following proposition, part (a) was proved in both [12, Propositions 6 and 8] and [13, Corollary 2.2 and Theorem 2.3]; and part (b) is proved in [12, Propositions 7 and 9] (and in both parts the block multiplicities may be greater than 1). In both papers these observations were applied to strengthen the results of [17] (see [12,Propositions 12 and 9] and [13,Theorem 2.4]). Note that although the applications in [12,13] are to symmetric designs, Proposition 2.8 is valid for all flag-transitive point-imprimitive designs.…”
Section: General Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the following proposition, part (a) was proved in both [12, Propositions 6 and 8] and [13, Corollary 2.2 and Theorem 2.3]; and part (b) is proved in [12, Propositions 7 and 9] (and in both parts the block multiplicities may be greater than 1). In both papers these observations were applied to strengthen the results of [17] (see [12,Propositions 12 and 9] and [13,Theorem 2.4]). Note that although the applications in [12,13] are to symmetric designs, Proposition 2.8 is valid for all flag-transitive point-imprimitive designs.…”
Section: General Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In both papers these observations were applied to strengthen the results of [17] (see [12,Propositions 12 and 9] and [13,Theorem 2.4]). Note that although the applications in [12,13] are to symmetric designs, Proposition 2.8 is valid for all flag-transitive point-imprimitive designs.…”
Section: General Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2022, Mandić and Šubašić [12] treated all other open possibilities reported in [15] excluding two sets of parameters. Recently, Montinaro [13] made a contribution to the study of point‐imprimitive symmetric designs when k>λ(λ3)2 $k\gt \lambda (\lambda -3)\unicode{x02215}2$ with a size of the intersection of block and imprimitivity class at least 3. In our study of point‐imprimitive symmetric designs with sporadic almost simple automorphism groups, we observe that the candidate parameter sets fall into type “a” or “b”, the first two parts in [15, Theorem 1.1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%