2023
DOI: 10.5802/alco.297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing flag-transitive point-imprimitive 2-designs

Alice Devillers,
Cheryl E. Praeger

Abstract: In this paper we develop several general methods for analysing flag-transitive pointimprimitive 2-designs, which give restrictions on both the automorphisms and parameters of such designs. These constitute a tool-kit for analysing these designs and their groups. We apply these methods to complete the classification of flag-transitive, point-imprimitive 2-(v, k, λ) designs with λ at most 4.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So assume that 1 ≤ i < s. Since B is the disjoint union of all the intersections B ∩ C with C ∈ C i (B), we have C∈C i (B) y i = C∈C i (B) |B ∩ C| = |B| = k. Also, for any C ∈ C i , we have x C = y i if C ∈ C i (B), and x C = 0 otherwise; and since D is a 2-design, it follows from Theorem 2.2 that conditions Eqs. (10) and (11) in that theorem hold. We will show by induction that y i = y i for each i ∈ {1, .…”
Section: Proposition 43 With the Hypotheses Of Construction 42 (A) Th...mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…So assume that 1 ≤ i < s. Since B is the disjoint union of all the intersections B ∩ C with C ∈ C i (B), we have C∈C i (B) y i = C∈C i (B) |B ∩ C| = |B| = k. Also, for any C ∈ C i , we have x C = y i if C ∈ C i (B), and x C = 0 otherwise; and since D is a 2-design, it follows from Theorem 2.2 that conditions Eqs. (10) and (11) in that theorem hold. We will show by induction that y i = y i for each i ∈ {1, .…”
Section: Proposition 43 With the Hypotheses Of Construction 42 (A) Th...mentioning
confidence: 85%