2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9418(01)00059-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On evaluation of a limit separating amorphous and crystalline states based on thermal expansion measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The glass‐transition temperature is slightly dependent on fullerene concentration (Table III, correlation coefficient r = 0.7). A similar conclusion could be made for the thermal expansion coefficients for rubbers in glassy and rubbery states; α 2 /α 1 ratio is between 2.5 and 5.12 and it is characteristic of materials in the amorphous state 11, 21, 22. The temperature of the beginning of the plateau of high‐elasticity of a low‐temperature region, T ∞ ′, slightly increases as fullerene concentration grows.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The glass‐transition temperature is slightly dependent on fullerene concentration (Table III, correlation coefficient r = 0.7). A similar conclusion could be made for the thermal expansion coefficients for rubbers in glassy and rubbery states; α 2 /α 1 ratio is between 2.5 and 5.12 and it is characteristic of materials in the amorphous state 11, 21, 22. The temperature of the beginning of the plateau of high‐elasticity of a low‐temperature region, T ∞ ′, slightly increases as fullerene concentration grows.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The TMA allows11, 12 to determine temperatures of the glass transition T g and the beginning of flow T f . It is possible to identify several regions in the surface layer of polymers characterized by three states each and differing in linear thermal expansion coefficients in glassy and rubbery states as well as in the zone of melting of the crystalline portion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 and Table III). The α 2 /α 1 ratio of thermal expansion coefficients in rubbery and glassy state is between 2.5 and 5.12 and it is characteristic for amorphous materials 38, 42…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TMA allows38, 39 to determine temperatures of the glass transition T g and the beginning of flow T f . It is possible to identify several regions in a surface layer of the tested polymer material characterized by three physical states each and differing in linear thermal expansion coefficients in glassy and rubbery states 38, 39. TMA also makes possible to evaluate the molecular‐weight characteristic for the chain segments between junctions in individual regions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11). It is well-known that amorphous materials possess a more incompact structure compared to crystalline materials [37]. Thereby, it is inferred that a probable reason for the above result should be ascribed to the partial replacement of crystalline Mg(OH) 2 by amorphous MgCO 3 during CO 2 capture, which can cause a reduced pore size of CHS in the whole pore range.…”
Section: Fractal Characteristics Of Pore Surfaces Of Sorbentsmentioning
confidence: 88%