2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0026-2714(01)00138-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On discrete random dopant modeling in drift-diffusion simulations: physical meaning of `atomistic' dopants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the resolution of individual charges in "atomistic" simulations using a fine mesh creates problems [33]. Due to the use of Boltzmann or FermiDirac statistics in the classical drift-diffusion approach, the electron concentration follows the electrostatic potential gained from the solution of the Poisson equation.…”
Section: Simulation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the resolution of individual charges in "atomistic" simulations using a fine mesh creates problems [33]. Due to the use of Boltzmann or FermiDirac statistics in the classical drift-diffusion approach, the electron concentration follows the electrostatic potential gained from the solution of the Poisson equation.…”
Section: Simulation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to correct these problems in "atomistic" simulations have been made by charge smearing [20], [35] or by splitting of the Coulomb potential into short-and longrange components based on screening considerations [33]. The charge-smearing approach is however purely empirical and can result in a loss of resolution with respect to "atomistic" scale effects.…”
Section: Simulation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even if microscopic simulations such as the MC method are concerned, the treatment of the electrons and impurities is not straightforward due to, again, the long-range nature of the Coulomb potential. The incorporation of the short range-range Coulomb potential in the MC method has been a long-standing issue [84]. This problem is, in general, avoided by assuming that the electrons and the impurities are always screened by the other carriers so that the short-range part of the Coulomb interaction is effectively suppressed.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Screening factor was calculated as 2 Â N 1/3 , where N is arsenic doping concentration. Since all the nanowire FETs had low boron doping concentration in the channel regions, only the arsenic dopants of the source/drain regions were randomized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%