2008
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/10/1/015006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On diffusion processes with variable drift rates as models for decision making during learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An instance of this framework is the learning of reaction times when detecting coherent motion within a random motion field [18]. An analysis of behavioral data [19] indicates that performance improvements in this task largely result from an increase in the evidence rate. So the input into the decision making circuitry becomes more reliable, as it would in our population learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An instance of this framework is the learning of reaction times when detecting coherent motion within a random motion field [18]. An analysis of behavioral data [19] indicates that performance improvements in this task largely result from an increase in the evidence rate. So the input into the decision making circuitry becomes more reliable, as it would in our population learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral data can often be explained reasonably well by a wide range of models (Bogacz et al 2006;Churchland et al 2008;Deneve 2012;Ditterich 2006bDitterich , 2010Drugowitsch et al 2012;Eckhoff et al 2008;Huang and Rao 2013;Palmer et al 2005;Ratcliff and Smith 2004), even when applied to the same real (Ditterich 2006a(Ditterich , 2006bDrugowitsch et al 2012;Huang andRao 2013 Mazurek et al 2003;Palmer et al 2005;Roitman and Shadlen 2002) or simulated data (Donkin et al 2011). Instead, our objective was to assess to what degree the performance of our subjects using these multicolored DC stimuli was consistent with the performance of subjects in a range of previous decision-making tasks, especially those using RDK stimuli.…”
Section: Model Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining parameters were set to values used previously (m ϭ 1.25, ϭ 0.3, and r 0 ϭ 10 spikes/s; see Eckhoff et al 2008;Shadlen 2000, 2003).…”
Section: Psychometric Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biases were assumed to correspond to offsets to the initial (or, equivalently, final) positions of the drift-diffusion process by adding an additional term to Eq. 2 (Eckhoff et al 2008)…”
Section: Psychometric Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%