2008
DOI: 10.1152/jn.90629.2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Influences of Priors and Sensory Evidence on an Oculomotor Decision Variable During Perceptual Learning

Abstract: Gold JI, Law C-T, Connolly P, Bennur S. The relative influences of priors and sensory evidence on an oculomotor decision variable during perceptual learning. J Neurophysiol 100: 2653-2668. First published August 27, 2008 doi:10.1152/jn.90629.2008. Choice behavior on simple sensory-motor tasks can exhibit trial-to-trial dependencies. For perceptual tasks, these dependencies reflect the influence of prior trials on choices that are also guided by sensory evidence, which is often independent across trials. Here … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
152
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
8
152
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, although the single-trial estimates are based on more information than the single-trial RT, one might wonder whether the transformation is necessary at all; that is, perhaps raw RT might serve as a simpler proxy for fluctuations in response caution, with high response caution indicated by slow RT and vice versa. Indeed previous studies have made this assumption (Gold et al, 2008;Summerfield and Koechlin, 2010). Therefore, as a control on the STLBA method, we also computed correlations between raw RT and HR.…”
Section: Comparison To Response Time As a Proxy For Response Cautionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus, although the single-trial estimates are based on more information than the single-trial RT, one might wonder whether the transformation is necessary at all; that is, perhaps raw RT might serve as a simpler proxy for fluctuations in response caution, with high response caution indicated by slow RT and vice versa. Indeed previous studies have made this assumption (Gold et al, 2008;Summerfield and Koechlin, 2010). Therefore, as a control on the STLBA method, we also computed correlations between raw RT and HR.…”
Section: Comparison To Response Time As a Proxy For Response Cautionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To address these questions, we developed a probabilistic model of choice that takes into account both an internal neural response to contrast and systematic influences of nonvisual factors on the choices of the animal. To obtain this model, we adopted a framework that had been developed to study value-based decision making (Corrado et al, 2005;Lau and Glimcher, 2005) and endowed this framework with a sensory term (Seidemann, 1998;Gold et al, 2008). The result is a powerful model that accounts for both sensory and nonsensory determinants of choice.…”
Section: Probabilistic Choice Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For monkeys Cy and ZZ, training was combined with unit recordings in areas MT and LIP Law and Gold 2008). For At and Av, training was combined with a technique for assessing ongoing oculomotor activity during decision formation using saccadic eye movements evoked with electrical microstimulation of the frontal eye field (FEF; Connolly et al 2009;Gold et al 2008).…”
Section: E T H O D Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2;Gold and Shadlen 2003;Gold et al 2008;Law and Gold 2008). Briefly, visual stimuli were generated in MATLAB on a Macintosh computer, using the Psychophysics Toolbox software (Brainard 1997;Pelli 1997) with custom additions to draw the motion stimulus, and presented on a 21-in.…”
Section: Behavioral Task and Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%