2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(02)00646-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On determining accurate positions, separations, and internal profiles for delta layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we do not associate these parameters with identified physical phenomena but note that the whole function provides a very good description for delta layer profiles in organic materials. The centroid of this function is given by the center of the Gaussian part minus λ u , plus λ d [23]. It is this centroid that we shall use to define the depth sputtered for determining the sputtering rates.…”
Section: Sputtering Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we do not associate these parameters with identified physical phenomena but note that the whole function provides a very good description for delta layer profiles in organic materials. The centroid of this function is given by the center of the Gaussian part minus λ u , plus λ d [23]. It is this centroid that we shall use to define the depth sputtered for determining the sputtering rates.…”
Section: Sputtering Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, these authors presented an analytical solution of the convolution integral as a delta layer response function or depth resolution function (DRF). Since then, the complete empirical DRF for SIMS, consisting of two exponentials and one Gaussian, was elaborated further and was successfully applied to numerous SIMS depth profiles of thin layers, notably atomic monolayers [43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. In 2003, the delta layer response function for SIMS after Dowsett et al was accepted as an ISO standard by the technical committee TC 201 on Surface Chemical Analysis [7].…”
Section: The Analytical Depth Resolution Function Of the Mri Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4͑b͒ by the curve with the white-centered circular points. 18 Here, this is at 0.07 nm. Wittmaack 22 felt that the peak position, z p , is safer than the centroid, z c .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A better fit is achieved with the response function of Dowsett et al 18,20,40,41 intended for use in profiling delta layers. The response function of Dowsett et al is for a delta function at one position with a rise to the maximum intensity of an exponential with characteristic length, u , and followed by a decay with characteristic length d .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation