1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70010-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Crossed Apraxia. Description of a Right-Handed Apraxic Patient with Right Supplementary Motor Area Damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The cluster labelled "handedness and limb praxis" cannot account for the cases reported by Marchetti and Della Sala (1997) and by Raymer et al (1999) who were both right-handed and both had a severe crossed apraxia. The cluster named "language and bucco-facial praxis" cannot accommodate the 48 % of patients with crossed aphasia but with no signs of face apraxia reported by the authors themselves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The cluster labelled "handedness and limb praxis" cannot account for the cases reported by Marchetti and Della Sala (1997) and by Raymer et al (1999) who were both right-handed and both had a severe crossed apraxia. The cluster named "language and bucco-facial praxis" cannot accommodate the 48 % of patients with crossed aphasia but with no signs of face apraxia reported by the authors themselves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Evidence is surprisingly scarce. While it is true that some left-handers do show signs of apraxia following right hemisphere lesions (Poeck & Kerschensteiner 1971;Valenstein & Heilman 1979;Dobato et al 2001), the same can be said for some right-handed patients (Marchetti & Della Sala 1997;Raymer et al 1999). On the neuroimaging side, left-handed participants do show greater recruitment of right parietal, frontal and temporal cortices than right-handers when listening to the sounds made by using handheld tools versus animals, and this might reflect automatic activation of right-lateralized praxis representations .…”
Section: Hand Dominance and Praxismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Left brain damage usually affects both hands, whereas right brain damage affects only the left hand, suggesting that the left hemisphere is fully competent for processing movement concepts and also contributes to the generation of movements in the right hemisphere. Apraxic deficits following left hemisphere lesions are also more frequent (De Renzi, Motti and Nichelli, 1980;Weiss, Dohle, Binkofski, Schnitzler, Freund and Hefter, 2001), however, in some rare cases, severe apraxia was observed following right hemisphere lesions (Marchetti and Sala, 1997;Raymer, Merians, Adair, Schwartz, Williamson, Rothi, Poizner and Heilman, 1999). The concept of crossed apraxia was introduced to describe patients with this opposite pattern of limb apraxia that cannot be explained by handedness.…”
Section: Contributions Of the Left And Right Brain Hemispheresmentioning
confidence: 99%