2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-015-0951-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On conic QPCCs, conic QCQPs and completely positive programs

Abstract: This paper studies several classes of nonconvex optimization problems defined over convex cones, establishing connections between them and demonstrating that they can be equivalently formulated as convex completely positive programs. The problems being studied include: a conic quadratically constrained quadratic program (QCQP), a conic quadratic program with complementarity constraints (QPCC), and rank constrained semidefinite programs. Our results do not make any boundedness assumptions on the feasible region… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will now prove that strict copositivity of at least one Q i guarantees attainability of (2.2), even without the assumption that the objective is bounded below on the feasible set. This result complements prior investigations [36] and a recent study [3]. Let us first establish the following auxiliary result.…”
Section: A Two-fold Characterization Of Semi-lagrangian Dualsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…We will now prove that strict copositivity of at least one Q i guarantees attainability of (2.2), even without the assumption that the objective is bounded below on the feasible set. This result complements prior investigations [36] and a recent study [3]. Let us first establish the following auxiliary result.…”
Section: A Two-fold Characterization Of Semi-lagrangian Dualsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Furthermore, we emphasize that this result is not straightforward. Contrary to the case of quadratic objective and linear constrained problems with some binary variables, where one can apply Burer's results (Burer, 2009, Theorem 2.6); the above formulation is quadratic in the objective, in the constraints and also includes binary variables; and in our case the most recent, known sufficient conditions for obtaining conic reformulations do not directly apply (Burer, 2012;Burer and Dong, 2012;Peña et al, 2015;Bai et al, 2016). In all cases, those results require some nonnegativity condition of the considered quadratic constraints on the feasible region of the problem.…”
Section: A Completely Positive Reformulation Of Dompmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is shown in Bai et al [2] that (4) can be reformulated as a convex conic completely positive optimization problem. However, the cone in the completely positive formulation does not have a polynomial-time separation oracle.…”
Section: Semidefinite Cone Complementarity Formulation For Rank Minimmentioning
confidence: 99%