The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2007.03.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On choosability of some complete multipartite graphs and Ohba's conjecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adding one dominant vertex to K 3,3 gives K 1,3,3 , which again is 3-choosable [16]. In fact, this property holds for infinitely many complete bipartite graphs [16]; also see [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding one dominant vertex to K 3,3 gives K 1,3,3 , which again is 3-choosable [16]. In fact, this property holds for infinitely many complete bipartite graphs [16]; also see [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part (ii) of Theorem C follows from part (i) if t = 0 and from Theorem B(iv) if t = 1; it was proved by Shen et al [11] for t = 2, 3, and by Shen et al [12] for t = 4. Part (iii) is the same as part (i) or part (ii) if t = 0 or 1, respectively; it was proved by He et al [5] for t = 2, and by Shen et al [10] in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Ohba [16] conjectured that for any positive integer k, k-colourable graphs with at most 2k +1 vertices are k-choosable. This conjecture has been studied in many papers [10,12,[14][15][16][17][19][20][21], and was confirmed by Noel, Reed and Wu [15]: Theorem 1.1 Every k-colourable graph with at most 2k + 1 vertices is k-choosable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Theorem 4.1 takes care of complete k-partite graphs with 3 − -parts, except that either one 5-part or at most two 4-parts. It was proved in [21] that G = K 6,2⋆(k−3),1⋆2 is kchoosable. So either G has a 6 + -part and G ≠ K 6,2⋆(k−3),1⋆2 , or two 5-parts or three 4-parts.…”
Section: Pseudo-l-colouringmentioning
confidence: 99%