2019
DOI: 10.1364/oe.27.001941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-chip mode converter based on two cascaded Bragg gratings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to now, various mode converters have been proposed. Three methods are usually utilized for mode conversions: (1) phase matching; (2) beam shaping; and (3) coherent scattering [13]- [16]. Based on these methods, mode conversions that are realized by gradual index change or lowcontrast index modulation such as tapers and Bragg gratings, cannot well address the challenges like the large device footprint, limited operation bandwidth and robustness, lack of scalability for more mode order conversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, various mode converters have been proposed. Three methods are usually utilized for mode conversions: (1) phase matching; (2) beam shaping; and (3) coherent scattering [13]- [16]. Based on these methods, mode conversions that are realized by gradual index change or lowcontrast index modulation such as tapers and Bragg gratings, cannot well address the challenges like the large device footprint, limited operation bandwidth and robustness, lack of scalability for more mode order conversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows the calculated mode CE and CT of the proposed TM 0 -to-TM 3 mode-order converter as functions of the length L 3 (L 6 ), width W 3 (W 6 ), and relative distance W s (W m ) of slot 3 (6). Note that for the mode-order converter, high mode CE was a paramount evaluation index which reflected well its pivotal mode conversion performance [11][12][13][14][15][19][20][21][22]. Meanwhile, we also employed CT between the required mode (TM 3 mode) and other modes at the output port to characterize the mode purity for the mode conversion process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Some prevailing optimization methods (e.g., deep learning and topology optimization [16][17][18]) have also been used to find the optimal structure pattern at the cost of quite time-consuming iterative calculations and complex patterns for the device fabrication. Compared with these latest reports, some classical structures such as Mach−Zehnder interferometers (MZI) [19,20] and Bragg gratings [21,22] are still employed to realize the mode-order conversion due to their simple structures, high performance and clear working mechanisms. However, the main issue of these typical schemes are their device lengths (>50 µm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical results show that the conversion efficiencies of TE 0 -to-TE 1 , TE 0 -to-TE 2 , and TE 0 -to-TE 3 mode-order converters are larger than 94.4%, 95.7%, and 83.7% in the wavelength range from 1.5 to 1.6 μm, with corresponding device lengths of 8.72, 4.98, and 14.54 μm, respectively. Recently, TE 1 -to-TE 2 mode conversion was achieved via two cascaded SWGs, which shows the potential for realizing arbitrary mode-order converters by cascading multiple SWGs [59]. Another type of mode handling device is the mode blocking filter, which suppresses undesired modes without affecting others.…”
Section: Subwavelength Structured Mode Handling Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%