2012
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-2012-11349-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On bilinear Littlewood-Paley square functions

Abstract: In this paper, we study the bilinear Littlewood-Paley square function introduced by M. Lacey. We give an easy proof of its boundedness from L p (R d) × L q (R d) into L r (R d), d ≥ 1, for all possible values of exponents p, q, r, i.e. for 2 ≤ p, q ≤ ∞, 1 ≤ r ≤ ∞ satisfying 1 p + 1 q = 1 r. We also prove analogous results for bilinear square functions on the torus group T d .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bernicot [4] has verified this conjecture for a particular case of equidistant intervals of the same length, such as Ω = {[j, j + 1) : j ∈ Z}. The problem becomes simpler if we replace ½ ω with a smooth bump function adapted to ω, as was already observed by Lacey [28] in the case of the intervals [j, j + 1), see also [5], [32], [33]. The above bilinear square function S is associated with smooth truncations of the lacunary intervals Ω = {[2 j , 2 j+1 ) : j ∈ Z}.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Bernicot [4] has verified this conjecture for a particular case of equidistant intervals of the same length, such as Ω = {[j, j + 1) : j ∈ Z}. The problem becomes simpler if we replace ½ ω with a smooth bump function adapted to ω, as was already observed by Lacey [28] in the case of the intervals [j, j + 1), see also [5], [32], [33]. The above bilinear square function S is associated with smooth truncations of the lacunary intervals Ω = {[2 j , 2 j+1 ) : j ∈ Z}.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The case m = 2 of this theorem was obtained by Ratnakumar and Shrivastava [11]. The new ingredient of this note is the extension of this result to the case where m ≥ 3, where a multilinear version of Young's inequality is needed.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The proofs of these results were based on rather complicated timefrequency analysis. However, Ratnakumar and Shrivastava [11] provided a proof for the boundedness of a smooth bilinear square functions, which is based on more elementary techniques. Motivated by the work of [11] and the increasing interest in multilinear operators, the aim of this paper is to study the L p boundedness properties of smooth m-(sub)linear Littlewood-Paley square functions.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%