1970
DOI: 10.1364/ao.9.002179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-Axis Irradiance of a Focused, Apertured Gaussian Beam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus we abandon this plan and intend to optimize the beam parameters for a maximum light intensity across the receiving telescope. As deduced from [23] the maximum intensity is reached for the waist placed at the transmitting telescope's aperture. For long arms the on-axis far-field intensity at the receiver can then be expressed as where α is the waist radius in units of the telescope radius:…”
Section: Lasers Optics and Photoreceiversmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus we abandon this plan and intend to optimize the beam parameters for a maximum light intensity across the receiving telescope. As deduced from [23] the maximum intensity is reached for the waist placed at the transmitting telescope's aperture. For long arms the on-axis far-field intensity at the receiver can then be expressed as where α is the waist radius in units of the telescope radius:…”
Section: Lasers Optics and Photoreceiversmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Figure16. The response to gravitational waves of a single link (here: aligned with the x-axis) depends on the gravitational wave incident vector k with orthogonal components u and v. The actual oscillation is polarization dependent as indicated in Figure15.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focal length of this secondary mirror was chosen so that the 1/e 2 diameter of the transmitted Gaussian beam was 0.8 times the diameter of the primary paraboloid. This is the result of a compromise, using the equations of Holmes et al [5] between the effects of beam truncation (due to the 6 in. aperture) and beam obscuration (due to the secondary mirror) on both the total transmitted power and on the illumination intensity at the focus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%