2021
DOI: 10.1080/10916466.2021.1918712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On application of machine learning method for history matching and forecasting of times series data from hydrocarbon recovery process using water flooding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning, being an iterative process utilizing data to unveil underlying patterns, is well suited for solving inverse problems related to geothermal reservoir modeling. AI and ML technologies can also help in developing data-oriented history matching models, like the AI-and ML-based history matching approach proposed in [31]; additionally, AI and ML methods can also be used to quantify porosity and permeability trends, which can be used for THMC modeling, as proposed in [32]. Numerical simulations in geothermal reservoir modeling provide valuable insights into the behavior and characteristics of subsurface formations.…”
Section: Application Of New Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning, being an iterative process utilizing data to unveil underlying patterns, is well suited for solving inverse problems related to geothermal reservoir modeling. AI and ML technologies can also help in developing data-oriented history matching models, like the AI-and ML-based history matching approach proposed in [31]; additionally, AI and ML methods can also be used to quantify porosity and permeability trends, which can be used for THMC modeling, as proposed in [32]. Numerical simulations in geothermal reservoir modeling provide valuable insights into the behavior and characteristics of subsurface formations.…”
Section: Application Of New Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those cases can be related to having few training samples due to unavailable field data, not taking into consideration the fracture geometry, etc. [106]. Pal M. [106] was the first to develop a DL-RNN-LSTM model to predict future oil and water production rates in a time series way for a tight carbonate reservoir under water-flooding with long horizontal wells, using a limited amount of real injection and production data as inputs.…”
Section: Dynamic Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[106]. Pal M. [106] was the first to develop a DL-RNN-LSTM model to predict future oil and water production rates in a time series way for a tight carbonate reservoir under water-flooding with long horizontal wells, using a limited amount of real injection and production data as inputs. Due to data collection issues, such as challenges in injection/production measurements, in the collection of highfrequency injection/production data and in variations of injection/production data, data quality issues emerged; thus, simple manual data pre-processing procedures (e.g., checks for data formatting errors, missing values, repeated rows, spelling inconsistencies, etc.)…”
Section: Dynamic Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study that discussed the use of RNN-LSTM to estimate oil, gas, and water outputs of wells based on injection patterns in a time-series manner was investigated by the author. The RNN-LSTM model was able to estimate oil, water, and gas production with a first-year accuracy of over 90% and production values for up to 5 years with a 73.63 percent accuracy [ 7 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%