Applications of Cognitive Work Analysis 2008
DOI: 10.1201/9781420063059.ch12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On an Ontological Foundation for Work Domain Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the lower level are empirical constructs-materially grounded objects that capture and utilize the specific knowledge of subject matter experts. With two abstraction hierarchies as a primary analytic tool, Little (2009) argued that the elemental components of such hierarchies be described in terms of their underlying ontological structure. Al Rashdan, Browning, and Ritter (2019) have defined such ontologies for NPPs.…”
Section: Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the lower level are empirical constructs-materially grounded objects that capture and utilize the specific knowledge of subject matter experts. With two abstraction hierarchies as a primary analytic tool, Little (2009) argued that the elemental components of such hierarchies be described in terms of their underlying ontological structure. Al Rashdan, Browning, and Ritter (2019) have defined such ontologies for NPPs.…”
Section: Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that the individual means-ends relationships between elements of this hierarchy can be made compatible with the ontological framework laid out in Al Rashdan, Browning & Ritter (2019). See also Little (2009) and the discussion in Section 2.3.2. Specifically, components higher in the hierarchy consist of functions to be accomplished, whereas components lower in the hierarchy consist of ways in which accomplishment can take place.…”
Section: Piandrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together these levels provide a sufficient granular decomposition of all items of interest in the work domain. (Little, in Bisantz & Burns, 2008;Little, in Borgo & Lesmo, 2008;Little, 2009).…”
Section: Abstraction-decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AH can thus be regarded as a formal ontological framework for understanding the work domain. It also provides a rigorous theoretical foundation for understanding the categorical decomposition of the part-whole relations (Little, 2009).…”
Section: Abstraction Hierarchymentioning
confidence: 99%