2021
DOI: 10.1002/pamm.202100235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Adaptive Patankar Runge–Kutta methods

Abstract: We apply Patankar Runge-Kutta methods to y ′ = M (y)y and focus on the case where M (y) is a graph Laplacian as the resulting scheme will preserve positivity and total mass. The second order Patankar Heun method is tested using four test problems (stiff and non-stiff) cast into this form. The local error is estimated and the step size is chosen adaptively. Concerning accuracy and efficiency, the results are comparable to those obtained with a traditional L-stable, second order Rosenbrock method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, MPRK methods have not yet been improved with respect to their efficiency. Up to now, only standard step size controllers were used for a particular PRK method [45]. However, the construction of a tailored time step controller is still missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, MPRK methods have not yet been improved with respect to their efficiency. Up to now, only standard step size controllers were used for a particular PRK method [45]. However, the construction of a tailored time step controller is still missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%