2021
DOI: 10.1002/pamm.202100027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Developments in the Field of Modified Patankar‐Runge‐Kutta‐methods

Abstract: Modified Patankar‐Runge‐Kutta (MPRK) schemes are numerical one‐step methods for the solution of positive and conservative production‐destruction systems (PDS). They adapt explicit Runge‐Kutta schemes in a way to ensure positivity and conservation of the numerical approximation irrespective of the chosen time step size. Due to nonlinear relationships between the next and current iterate, the stability analysis for such schemes is lacking. In this work, we introduce a strategy to analyze the MPRK22(α)‐schemes in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(240 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for |w n 1 | < , where U and u are given in (19). According to Theorem 2.6, the fixed point 0 ∈ R 2 of G is stable, if the fixed point 0 ∈ R is a stable fixed point of G. From (18) and (20) we see…”
Section: Now We Definementioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…for |w n 1 | < , where U and u are given in (19). According to Theorem 2.6, the fixed point 0 ∈ R 2 of G is stable, if the fixed point 0 ∈ R is a stable fixed point of G. From (18) and (20) we see…”
Section: Now We Definementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Taking advantage of the transformation T, this is equivalent to proving that w n+1 = G(w n ) is locally convergent to 0, if the starting value w 0 is sufficiently close to 0 and satisfies w 0 1 = 0. Moreover, since G leaves the first component of its argument fixed, see (20), we only need to show w n 2 → 0 for n → ∞. According to Theorem 2.5 b) the distance of (w n 1 , w n 2 ) ∈ R 2 to the center manifold tends to zero for n → ∞, i. e.…”
Section: Now We Definementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, summation in (1.5) shows 𝑦 1 (𝑡) + 𝑦 2 (𝑡) = 𝑦 0 1 + 𝑦 0 2 for all 𝑡 ≥ 0, which confirms that the PDS is also conservative. The system (1.3) is also considered in [20], where it is used to study a linearization of second order MPRK schemes. Section 3 extends the results of [20] to the nonlinear case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which was also used in [21] for studying the linearization of MPRK22 schemes. Hence, to understand the stability behavior of such nonlinear schemes, one should directly investigate the system (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%