2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11590-008-0085-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a posterior evaluation of a simple greedy method for set packing

Abstract: We consider an approach for ex post evaluation of approximate solutions obtained by a well known simple greedy method for set packing. A performance bound is derived that is a function of the highest average reward per item over subsets as well as the number of allocated subsets and ground items. This a posterior bound can enable much revelation of optimality when the solution is near optimal. One of the advantages of the ex post analysis is that it does not require computing the optimal solution to the LP rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Landete et al (2013) proposed alternate formulations for SPP in higher dimensions and then added valid inequalities that were facets to the lifted polytope. Kwon et al (2008) and Kolokolov and Zaozerskaya (2009) also proposed new facets that strengthen the relaxed formulations of SPP. Li et al (2020) encoded SPP as a maximum weighted independent set and then used a Diversion Local Search based on the Weighted Configuration Checking (DLSWCC) algorithm to solve it.…”
Section: Phase 2: Set Packingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landete et al (2013) proposed alternate formulations for SPP in higher dimensions and then added valid inequalities that were facets to the lifted polytope. Kwon et al (2008) and Kolokolov and Zaozerskaya (2009) also proposed new facets that strengthen the relaxed formulations of SPP. Li et al (2020) encoded SPP as a maximum weighted independent set and then used a Diversion Local Search based on the Weighted Configuration Checking (DLSWCC) algorithm to solve it.…”
Section: Phase 2: Set Packingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is useful to formulate, when it is possible, discrete optimization problems as integer linear programming models, in order to use different well-known optimization techniques for their solving [22,23,34]. Following that idea a GAs is used on the mixed integer linear programming formulation for the MHS described below.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is useful to formulate, when it is possible, discrete optimization problems as integer or mixed integer programming models, in order to use different well-known optimization techniques for their solving [16,17,21]. Following that idea we have used the CPLEX solver on the new integer linear programming formulation for the MSSP described below.…”
Section: An Integer Linear Programming Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%