2001
DOI: 10.4064/aa99-4-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a generalization of the Maillet determinant II

Abstract: Dedicated to Professor Katsuya Miyake on his sixtieth birthday 1. Introduction. In the previous paper [16] (referred to as Part I hereafter) we have rendered it visible that the two intimately connected problems of number theory, Maillet determinants and Chowla's problem, were dealt with in complete separation, save for Girstmair [11], where this interaction was duly noticed and proved to be crucial.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer to part of the definition of the Maillet determinant [8]. In the extensive list of Yamamura [15] on Maillet determinants, that in [8] is referred to as one centering around the even part. Ref.…”
Section: Ramachandra Units and Even Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We refer to part of the definition of the Maillet determinant [8]. In the extensive list of Yamamura [15] on Maillet determinants, that in [8] is referred to as one centering around the even part. Ref.…”
Section: Ramachandra Units and Even Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly to passages surrounding [7,Lemma 2.4] we state the even case in which the procedure is almost verbatim to the odd case with B k replaced by A k ; cf. [8,14,21].…”
Section: Dirichlet Characters and L-functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(See Girstmair [1], Hirabayashi [6] and [4].) For general types of determinant formulas see Hirabayashi [5], Kanemitsu and Kuzumaki [7] and Kučera [8].…”
Section: Hirabayashimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present paper, for a real abelian number field K, we define an analogue Q(K) of the Maillet determinant in terms of the Clausen function in [6]. We give a class number formula for K in Section 3.…”
Section: Hpmentioning
confidence: 99%