2006
DOI: 10.1080/00036810500277876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a class of nonlinear nonclassical parabolic equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Problems of this type (17) were previously mentioned in [23] and considered in [24], but afterwards they have been somewhat overlooked in the literature.…”
Section: Discussion On the Uniqueness Of Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Problems of this type (17) were previously mentioned in [23] and considered in [24], but afterwards they have been somewhat overlooked in the literature.…”
Section: Discussion On the Uniqueness Of Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differentiability in the φ and f components follows immediately from applying Theorem 1 and the estimate (6) to the initial boundary value problems (24) and (25), which imply that they have the unique solutions ∆u φ ∈ H 1,0 (Q) and ∆u f ∈ H 1,0 (Q) and that the mappings L 2 (Ω) ∋ ∆φ → ∆u φ ∈ H 1,0 (Q) and L 2 (Ω) ∋ ∆f → ∆u f ∈ H 1,0 (Q) define the bounded linear operators U φ and U f , which, by definition, they satisfy U φ ∆φ = ∆u φ = u(q, φ + ∆φ, f ) − u(q, φ, f ) and…”
Section: Variational Formulationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Completion of the proof of Theorem 1.2 in this case: Our argument for long time existence in this case is simplified by axial symmetry, which reduces our problem to the setting of a scalar parabolic PDE with one spatial direction. While there are various results particular to such parabolic PDEs (see, for example, [14,24] and the references therein), here we use an argument more closely related to that in the previous section; when we fix time the resulting evolution equation is an ODE. Specifically, let us parametrise the evolving hypersurface as a radial graph by X :…”
Section: Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,6,7,16,17,28]. We name (1) by nonclassical parabolic equation after [16,17,26,28,30] since the term u xxt is involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%